Scan your website. Fix what matters first.
Run a fast public website check and get a repair plan matched to your platform. No account required.
A full public address. If you leave the scheme off, https:// is added before the scan.
ToolFlect Inspect checks publicly visible website configuration. It does not perform penetration testing or guarantee security, SEO rankings, or accessibility compliance.
What we check
Four areas, all read from the response the public internet already receives.
-
Search & Sharing
The page title, description, canonical address and sharing preview that a search engine or a chat app will use when this page is linked.
-
Public Security Configuration
The response headers and cookie attributes a browser reads before it decides how far to trust the page. Visible configuration only — nothing is probed or attacked.
-
Performance Basics
How much was transferred, how many separate files the page asks for, and what has to load before the first paint. Measured from the response, not from a browser.
-
Detected Platform
Which CMS, theme, plugin or CDN is serving the page, so the repair steps can name your own screens instead of describing them in the abstract.
What a repair looks like
One finding, in full, exactly as the scanner produced it.
Recorded from the ToolFlect Inspect test fixture
minimal-site.com — a synthetic page in our own test suite, not a customer
site. The finding, the evidence, the steps and the verification line below are the
scanner's real output for that page, copied without editing.
The page has no title tag
Guidance cites a published standard, not a menu path
Source: HTML Standard, "The title element" (whatwg.org); and Google Search Central, "Title links" documentationWhat is wrong
There is no <title> element in the HTML source. Search engines and browsers have nothing to label the page with, so they invent one from page content or the URL.
Why it matters
The title is the headline a search result shows. Without one, the result is likely to be something you did not choose.
Evidence
No <title> element was found in the document source.
How to fix it
- Open the template or CMS field that renders this page and find the head section.
- Add a single title element inside the head.
- Describe this specific page in the words someone would search for.
- Make it unique across the site — do not reuse another page’s title.
How to verify the fix
View the page source in a browser and confirm the change is present in the returned HTML.
Why we say this
Menu paths change between plugin versions, plans, and themes. When we can't cite a documented path, we say so rather than send you to the wrong screen. This is a deliberate choice.
How it works
-
Enter your website address
One public address. No account and no email.
-
We run a safe public scan
The scanner requests the page the way any visitor's browser would, then reads what came back. It never logs in, never submits a form, and never probes for vulnerabilities.
-
You get a prioritized repair plan
Findings are ordered by how much they matter and how confident the scan is, and each one carries the steps for your platform — or an honest note that we have no verified steps.
-
Rescan to verify the fix
After you change something, scan the same address again and compare the two results.
Supported platforms
Repair guidance is written per platform, and how well each one is verified differs. The counts below are computed from the repair knowledge base itself, so this page cannot claim more coverage than it has.
-
Cloudflare
Full step-by-step guidance.
15 repair records. 13 cite a page from Cloudflare's own documentation that was fetched and read, including the click sequence for creating a Response Header Transform Rule.
-
Rank Math
Named screens, and general guidance.
11 repair records. Rank Math's documentation was searched for each one and names the fields involved, but does not document a step-by-step sequence, so every record says so rather than sending you to a screen we could not confirm.
-
Yoast SEO
Named screens, and general guidance.
10 repair records, in the same position as Rank Math: Yoast's own help pages were read and are cited, and they name the fields, but they do not document a full click sequence for these checks.
-
WordPress
General guidance only.
12 records for WordPress itself, without a plugin. 8 are platform-neutral steps, because the setting these checks concern is usually owned by the theme or a plugin rather than by WordPress core. Where WordPress does document the screen, the record cites it.
-
Kadence
General guidance only.
5 records. No Kadence article confirming a settings path for these checks was found, so every record gives the platform-neutral steps and says a manual step is needed.
-
Elementor
General guidance only.
6 records, in the same position as Kadence: no Elementor article confirming a widget settings path was found, so the records are platform-neutral and flagged for manual review.
-
Hostinger
General guidance only.
6 records. One cites a Hostinger tutorial for forcing HTTPS with .htaccess. The rest are platform-neutral, because the setting is generally owned by the application rather than by the hosting panel.
Every check also has platform-neutral guidance: all 78 rules have a record that applies to any site, so a scan always produces steps to follow even when the platform is unknown. Where a platform's documentation was searched and came up short, the record says which of those two situations you are in.
Why we don't guess
Plenty of scanners will confidently tell you to open a menu that was renamed two versions ago. That wastes your time and makes the whole report less believable, so this one labels every piece of repair guidance with exactly how it was obtained.
-
Verified against vendor documentation
15 records cite a page from the vendor that was fetched and read, with the date it was read. The page is linked, so you can check it yourself.
-
Guidance cites a published standard, not a menu path
70 records rest on a specification — an RFC, the HTML Standard, or a search engine's own documentation — named with the section that defines the behaviour. There is no vendor screen to point at, because the setting may not have one.
-
Manual step — this platform's documentation didn't cover this case
26 records are marked for manual verification. Nothing in that platform's documentation covers the case, so the steps are deliberately platform-neutral.
-
We searched 2 sources on 2026-09-11 and found no documented step-by-step path
32 records record a search that was actually made. The vendor documentation either names the screen without documenting the sequence, or says nothing about it. The number of sources read, and the date, are written into the badge.
What a provenance label is, and is not
It is information about how the guidance was obtained. It is not a fault, not a warning about your website, and it never affects a finding's severity. None of the four labels above is an error, and none of them is shown in a warning colour anywhere in a report.
What this cannot do
-
We read source HTML
Anything a browser would add by running JavaScript was not seen. A page that builds its content in the browser may look emptier here than it does to a visitor.
-
No browser metrics
No Largest Contentful Paint, no Cumulative Layout Shift, no Total Blocking Time. Those need a real rendering scan, and this is a source scan.
-
Some repairs cannot be verified from outside
Where a scanner genuinely cannot confirm the setting, the check is marked for manual review rather than guessed at.
-
This is not a penetration test
Not a penetration test, not an accessibility certification, and not a legal compliance check. It reports publicly visible configuration, and nothing else.
Methodology
What the scanner does
It makes one ordinary HTTPS request for the address you give, follows a limited number of redirects, and reads the response. It reads bounded amounts of data and gives up at a fixed time limit, so a slow or enormous page cannot hold the service open.
What it refuses to do
It will only contact public internet addresses. Anything that resolves into a private network is refused before a connection is made, and that refusal happens the same way on every redirect the site sends. It never submits a form, never logs in, and never sends a request designed to provoke a fault.
Where the repair advice comes from
From a written, versioned knowledge base — not from a model and not from the scanned page. Every record carries the citation it was written from, and the provenance label in a report is generated from that citation. The complete provenance figures are in Why we don't guess.
How findings are ordered
By impact, discounted by how confident the scan is in what it observed. A check the scanner is unsure about cannot be reported as a high-priority problem, whatever its theoretical impact.
Privacy
No account, and no report address
An account is not needed and none is offered — a scan needs only the address you type. A report is never given a public address, never stored on the server after the request finishes, and never indexed by a search engine. It exists in your browser tab.
What stays in your browser
So that you can compare two scans, a short summary of each scan is saved in this browser: the address, when it ran, the counts, which platforms were detected, and which checks were reported as something to fix. No page content, no response headers, and nothing from inside a finding. It is capped at ten scans, it is never sent anywhere, and you can delete it from the scan screen or from your browser's own settings. Clearing your browser data removes it too.
No analytics, no advertising
This page loads no analytics, no advertising, no fonts and no scripts from anyone else. The only network request it makes is the one you ask for when you run a scan — to this site's own server.
Limits, so the service stays up
Scans are rate-limited per visitor and per website. That is an availability measure, and it applies to everyone equally.
About
ToolFlect Inspect
A free public website check, part of ToolFlect. It exists because most website checks either tell you nothing you can act on, or tell you to click things that do not exist any more. This one tries to say only what it can show.
What it will never do
It will not say that a site is safe from attack, that nothing further can be optimised, that an accessibility standard is met, or where a page will rank. A scan like this cannot know those things, and a report that claimed them would be worth less than one that did not.